When
I was a boy of five or six years old, invited by her friend, my mother took me
to a “church,” and I was gently separated from the adults into a group of
children for a “Sunday School” session after which we were rejoined with the
adults for the closing of the morning service.
That
fairly common description probably summons the experience of many readers as
from all appearances this was a traditional Protestant Christian denominational
routine. Not until many years later and after much more cognitive development,
did I realize just how different in some significant aspects my early
experience had been.
As
we know our early training begins at the very beginning, which some research
would indicate as prenatal and that the filters for whatever messages are planted
in us are next to none. As children we take these messages into our
subconscious with little critical analysis. These messages are the ideas of our
parents, our teachers and society at large.
For
many some of the early messages about God and religion had to do with ideas
about our essential nature as humans (e.g. sinful, incomplete, unholy) and
our relationship with a Supreme Being separate from ourselves and “his”
emissaries called prophets and saviors. Many of these messages were and are
meant to instill fears in an attempt to direct the development of young people
in a way that would reinforce the social order and mores of the day. Obedience
to laws and teachings that were foreordained by “The Church” and arose from
specific interpretations of handed down writings with their commandments,
canons and scriptures are a primary purpose of religious instruction.
Redemption,
salvation of the soul, proper moral comportment, assuring safe passage to a
heaven beyond or escape from the hot fires of hell were and still are common
themes in this instruction. The results have been the committed gathering of
strict adherents, those who go through the motions because it is expected by
their social group for acceptance, and the creation of refugees that either flee
to or create another organized group. In many cases people resolve to avoid
contact with anything organized around a religion or spiritual philosophy
whether an avowed atheist or not.
“There
is no spot where God is not,” along with the song, “Jesus Loves the Little
Children of the World” (black and yellow, red and white) are some of the
fragments that echo through my brain like the jingles of earlier radio and TV
commercials or a popular song. It’s my very personal experience of the power of
the subconscious and early messages I received.
Most
of my adult life I fit the category of people mostly disassociated from
organized religion and yet I’ve always been fascinated with the power of
religion and more so the power of belief.
I derived most of my knowledge from books with occasional encounters
with spiritual leaders and authors; a lecture by Huston Smith, an authority on
world religions, attending talks by Ram Dass, one of America’s great pop heroes
to walking in meditation with Thich Nat Hahn, the compassionate Vietnamese
Buddhist monk. At 17, I was in a college gymnasium with the Maharishi Mahesh
Yogi, founder of the TM movement.
There
is another sub-category that some fall within and those are the ones that
return to the faith of their childhood as adults with a deeper sense of
appreciation for ritual, ceremony, essential principles and the belonging to a
greater mission and community.
I
am one of those. My early experience with what has been called Religious
Science or the Science of Mind, a variant of the several movements and
organizations dubbed New Thought continued sporadically beyond those early
Sunday school days with a few visits here and there to what are now called
Centers for Spiritual Living. Founded by Ernest Holmes in the early 20th
century, the basic premise within Science of Mind is that everyone and
everything is spiritual right here and right now. The great Law of Cause and
Effect is operating unfailingly within an infinite field of Love. There is no
heaven or hell but what humans create first through their thoughts. This lies
at the very heart of the meaning of “free will.”
Holmes
drew from all the great traditions across religions, synthesizing what has been
called the perennial philosophy of the ages. He clearly saw that somewhere in
each of the great religions, universal truths were revealed. What was
distinctive about Holmes is that he knew that knowledge of one’s individual
spiritual nature, presence and power was not enough. One has to consciously
exercise this knowledge by focusing one’s attention on the greater Cause in
order to bring about desired Effects. Thoughts are things in rarified form and
materialize into solid form or matter, much as water in gas form condenses to
become liquid or freezes solid. In other words, what we think about and feel
strongly about, we most often bring about. It is a system, much as we’ve come
to understand as the basic structure of science.
A
biblical scholar, Holmes reviews all the great lessons of Christ’s teachings
throughout his writing and books, one of which is the understanding that what
some call God or Creator or Supreme Being is within each of us as well as permeating
every bit of the Universe. In a larger sense, we are each already perfect and whole. The
extent to which we believe this is the extent to which we can operate through
the great Law to our greatest advantage and for the highest purposes of all.
Disease, poverty, violence and disharmony are temporary conditions resulting from collective thought that keeps them in place and this can be
overcome individually and en masse through an active practice using these principles, meditation and what
is called “affirmative” prayer. We've much evidence to that effect when we look at the impact of some of our greatest spiritual teachers and leaders in our immediate past and present. These Holmes would call, as he calls Jesus, the example, not the exception.
Thousands have been healed and millions
positively affected over the course of the last 150 years, beginning with the
earliest practitioners in the 19th century. Uniquely American in
origin, the New Thought Movement itself has spread around the world and there
are 400 groups affiliated with the Centers for Spiritual Living alone. More emphasized
as Christian is the worldwide Unity Church though it utilizes similar
principles and practices.
Today
I enjoy participating in a community of people who learn and practice these
principles. In some ways I feel that my participation is a “giving back,” for
the joy, fulfillment, sense of empowerment and positivity that have been
powerful currents running throughout my wonderful life and in no small part a
result of this foundational early experience.
And
yet, the continued gifts I receive through a more conscious and systematic study
and application of scientific spiritual principles as well as being part of an
organization dedicated to transforming millions of lives through positive
thought and deed are greater than my showing up on a Sunday or any other day of
the week.
Just
knowing and acknowledging my very real spiritual nature, my goodness, wholeness
and capacity for love as expressed through my unique personality and creativity
and evidenced by all the experiences I attract in my life is surely gift
enough. And knowing that is true of everyone makes all the difference.
Randy Crutcher, EdD is a
member of the Everyday Center for Spiritual Living in Santa Fe, New Mexico. He
was contracted as a facilitator at the 2010 Integration Conference for the
final phases of reuniting two long divided organizational branches of the
world-wide Centers for Spiritual Living movement.
Amen, Randy. Well-said, and universally true...
ReplyDelete