As a mid-stream baby boomer I’ve watched
the world add between 4 and 5 billion more people to its surface since my
birth.
Along with awakening to the cumulative
impact we have on air, water, soil, forests, oceans, climate and all living things and systems,
some also recognize that the more people you have in one place, the more conflict
there is over resources of all kinds. Increasing human numbers make conflict inevitable. How
conflicts are resolved are not. We’ve chosen both peaceful and violent
means….and we still do on a daily basis. The fact remains, more of us are not
making things any easier.
Twenty years ago the Dalai Lama said this:
“The population problem is a serious
reality. In India, some
people were reluctant to accept birth
control because of religious
traditions. So I thought, from the
Buddhist viewpoint, there is a
possibility of flexibility on this
problem. I thought it might be good to
speak out and eventually create more open
space for leaders in other
religious traditions to discuss the
issue.”
How much speaking out is there these days?
It’s been 50 years since scientist Paul Ehrlich got us to recognize that the
“population bomb” is ticking. I find that the discussions about this underlying
cause of so much planetary stress are rarely a table topic these days. Have people just
become jaded and given up in the face of what seems inevitable, the net
addition (after subtracting deaths) of 34 million more people just since the
beginning of this year? It does seem daunting. And it could be worse.
Full disclosure is that I was once a
Director of Education for a Planned Parenthood affiliate. The non-profit is one
of the largest and most effective voluntary family planning education and
service delivery organizations in history. It and other efforts have helped
people for many decades to decide when to have children and how many, rather than
rely on roulette as the primary way of bringing healthy children into the
world. And it is one of the ways that people with lower income have gained access
to primary health care, in some cases saving lives. In effect, our population
would be far greater (and sicker) at this point without policies and funding that provide
people choices. And where these services are available, there is less human suffering and more prosperity.
When I was hired at Planned Parenthood, it was in large part due to the fact that I had established a center for men that provided information and education about reproductive health and responsibility. It was understood that until we more fully address the needs and psychology of men in the realm of reproductive choices, responsibility would continue to largely fall on women's shoulders. Now, a new test for fertility is coming to market that will help men immediately discover whether they are fertile or not. I am curious if this will lead to greater awareness on the part of men, not just those desperate to have their own biological offspring, but an overall recognition of the role men play in bringing more of us into an overpopulated world, one decision, one person, one couple, one family at a time.
When I was hired at Planned Parenthood, it was in large part due to the fact that I had established a center for men that provided information and education about reproductive health and responsibility. It was understood that until we more fully address the needs and psychology of men in the realm of reproductive choices, responsibility would continue to largely fall on women's shoulders. Now, a new test for fertility is coming to market that will help men immediately discover whether they are fertile or not. I am curious if this will lead to greater awareness on the part of men, not just those desperate to have their own biological offspring, but an overall recognition of the role men play in bringing more of us into an overpopulated world, one decision, one person, one couple, one family at a time.
Back to the Dalai Llama talking about religious beliefs in India 20 years ago, (a country now straining under an incredible 1.2 billion humans), it still remains that belief systems
control behavior. Whether it’s religious conviction, nationalism, a sense of
ethnic preservation or other social ideology justifying why we should
continue to “be fruitful and multiply,” at root is usually an entitled sense of male
dominance and control at worst, male pride at best that too often spirals our
numbers beyond carrying capacity all over the world. That, and the notion that technology solves
all problems and will solve this one by finding more Earths to populate. It
hasn’t and it won’t.
It’s time again to talk about how to keep
our numbers in check instead of relying on war, famine, disease and now climate
change to do the job. We need to consider those people who have been at this
effort for a long time and give them our support in the form of time or money
or both.
One of those efforts I have supported over
the years is the United Nations Fund for Population Activities. http://www.unfpa.org All over the world it has delivered services where least
available and difficult to access. A few dollars go a long way.
And what about making population a table
or bedroom topic again? Very intelligent and educated people need to consider
right now their decisions about how many children they have in the larger
context the Dalai Lama and other leaders have spoken about. And those less
educated need access to information and services as part of a comprehensive
health and wellness approach. We need to see this topic reintroduced in the
mass media and consistently framed as a fundamental problem that can be addressed in a
humane way that elevates human freedoms and liberty instead of being perceived
as taking them away.